The official name of this laser projection product family is still unclear to me—should it be called "Mia House Laser Projection TV" or "Mia House Laser Projection TV 150"? In theory, for an ultra-short-throw projector without a fixed screen, the size of the image is relative and depends on the distance from the wall. The farther you are, the bigger the image gets, and vice versa. However, in practice, a 150-inch 16:9 screen has a long side longer than three meters, which poses a challenge for most homes to accommodate such a large space. That’s why, when using this product at home and in the office, I’ve opted to keep the projected area around 100–120 inches.
From a design perspective, although the unit isn’t too large, its weight was more than I expected—7kg might not sound like much, but it feels substantial given the compact form factor and minimalist design. I was a bit surprised at first, as most similar-sized projectors usually weigh between 3–5kg. This extra weight likely comes from the built-in speaker system. Operation is straightforward: place the device near the wall or white surface, connect the power, press the power button, and follow the on-screen instructions. It functions just like other Xiaomi TVs or TV boxes. The only unique setup required is keystone correction and manual focusing of the screen.
Thanks to its ultra-short throw ratio of 0.233:1, I can achieve a screen larger than my 100-inch one by placing the unit just about 50cm from the bottom of the screen. At that point, I had to position the device as close to the wall as possible and adjust the trapezoidal correction to limit the actual projection size.
I compared the Mijia Laser Projection TV with the EPSON TW5350 using the same screen. Both played the same content (a video from Xiaomi's store), and I used a camera with fixed exposure settings. The room was completely dark, then lights were turned on (two LEDs near the screen). On the left and right sides, you can see the EPSON’s on/off effect, while the right side shows the Mijia’s. Honestly, even though I expected the results, I was a bit disappointed. The EPSON, an entry-level 3LCD projector with 2200 lumens, consistently outperformed the Mijia in brightness and color accuracy. The blue tones on the Mijia looked slightly purplish, despite its larger color gamut and added color technologies. This is a common issue with entry-level laser projectors, as I've seen similar problems with Casio’s commercial models before.
Another thing I noticed was some distortion in the upper-left corner of the screen on the Mijia. This was due to the unevenness of my home screen. While traditional projectors aren’t affected much by small imperfections, the ultra-short focus of the Mijia made them more visible. After moving the projector to a flat white wall in the office, the issue disappeared. Ultra-short-throw projectors typically require flat, rigid screens rather than rolling ones, which explains the need for specialized curtains.
The Mijia claims a 5000-lumen light source, but I think this is more of a marketing term. Since the projector is so close to the screen, direct eye contact with the bulb is unlikely. Therefore, the actual viewing brightness is lower. According to media tests, the real brightness is between 1200–1500 ANSI lumens, which is less than what you’d get from a standard laser projector. In bright ambient light, the colors and contrast drop significantly. If this were an LED micro-projector, I’d praise it for its brightness, but as a laser projector aimed at high-end home use, it falls short. Using a professional light-rejecting curtain would help, but these are expensive—starting at 5,000 yuan for a 100-inch version, which makes it hard to justify for many users.
Despite its shortcomings, the Mijia Laser Projection TV has some redeeming qualities. Its built-in speakers deliver surprisingly clear and balanced audio, especially in quiet environments. The noise and heat levels are also impressive—after running for half an hour, the unit remains cool enough to touch, and the fan is barely audible. In contrast, the EPSON’s cooling system is much louder and more disruptive.
This product marks a significant step forward in making laser projection more accessible. Xiaomi has once again disrupted the market by offering a high-tech product at a competitive price. While it may not match the performance of premium laser TVs, it opens up new possibilities for consumers who previously couldn’t afford such technology. It’s not perfect, but it’s a bold move that could drive further innovation in the industry.
If you're looking for smart TV or TV box information, check out Smart TV/box information network sofa butler (http://), a leading platform for smart TV news, reviews, and tech support in China.
BLPS laser safety protective device is designed for personal safety used on hydraulic bender.
The dynamic test technology it used has passed the Type 4 functional safety assessment by TUV, and get the national invention patent. The product reaches the advanced technological level of similar products.
BLPS laser safety device provides protection zone near the die tip of the bender to protect fingers and arms of the operator in close to the upper mold die tip. It is the most effective solution so far to preserves the safety and productivity of the bender.
Press Brake Protection,Laser Guarding Device,Press Brake Guarding Systems,Press Brake Guarding
Jining Keli Photoelectronic Industrial Co.,Ltd , https://www.sdkelien.com